The concept of Tax Deducted at Source ("TDS") was introduced with an aim to collect tax from the very source of income. As per this concept, a person who is liable to make payment of specified nature to any other person shall deduct tax at source and remit the same into the account of the Central Government.
The person from whose income, tax has been deducted at source would be entitled to get credit of the amount so deducted on the basis of Form 26AS or TDS certificate issued by the person deducting the tax.
As per Section 276 B of Income Tax Act, if a person fails to deposit the Tax Deducted at Source, he shall be punishable with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than three months but which may extend to seven years and with fine
CBDT Circular However as per the CBDT Instruction dated 28-05-1980 and 09-09-2019, the prosecution under Section 276B should not normally be proposed when the amount involved is less than Rs. 25 Lakhs and the period of default is less than 60 days and the amount in default has also been deposited in the meantime to the credit of the Government. But such relaxation will not apply to levy of interest under Section 201(1A)
The Honourable Courts have upheld in many cases that instructions and guidelines cannot override the specific provisions of the Income-tax Act and where there is conflict between the provisions of the Act and the rules or the rules and the instructions, it is provisions of the Act and the rules that would prevail and not the instructions.
The same was upheld in Bee Gee Motors and Tractors v. ITO and Vijay Singh v. Union of India & Anr that CBDT instructions will not protect an assessee from prosecution for non-compliance of TDS provisions
As spelled in “ITO vs Firoz Abdul Gafar Nadiadwala – 2014 “it appears that if the payment is made at belated stage then it will be treated as default and appropriate action can be taken under this Act. It also clear that deposit of TDS with delay does not absolve criminal liability” An assessee cannot be escaped from prosecution under Section 276B if the TDS amount that was deposited belatedly. In most of the cases where accused was convicted under Section 276B, assessee had deposited TDS belatedly, but no heed was given for the same
Section 279(2) of the IT Act provides for compounding of the offence of Section 276B.
What is Compounding of Offence? Compounding of offences means that the assessee can, instead of serving imprisonment term, pay a fee to the revenue department and waive his prosecution charges.
What is rate of compounding fees? Compounding fees is 5% per month or part of a month of amount in default. However, authorities determine as to what kind of offences should be compounded, if at all, and under what conditions.
The penal provisions with respect to delay and default in depositing the TDS are harsh and The harsh nature is apparent from the fact that there is no mitigating benefit to a person who has without any notice or demand has voluntarily paid the TDS along with interest for delayed period. Hence it is advised to comply with the provisions related to deduction and deposit of TDS without any fail, otherwise which may lead assesses landing in rigours imprisonment or huge penalties and fine.
Disclaimer:“Information contained herein is for informational purposes only and should not be used in deciding any particular case. The entire contents of this document have been prepared on the basis of relevant provisions and as per the information existing at the time of the preparation. Though utmost efforts have been made to provide authentic information, it is suggested that to have better understanding and obtaining professional advice after thorough examination of particular situation.”
Please share:
Sarvothama Shetty
Partner
Date: 11/12/2020
Copyright B.C Shetty & Co. © 2025. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy , Terms and Conditions