July 01, 2026
Taxability of rent-related receipts like maintenance has always been a debatable issue under the Income-tax Act, 1961, particularly in distinguishing between ‘Income from House Property’ and ‘Profits and Gains of Business or Profession’. Recent judicial rulings have reaffirmed and added an important dimension by holding that maintenance charges recovered from tenants to be taxed as business income where a separate agreement exists. (judicial principle developed over time and consistently followed up to ICAI Judicial Updates 2024–2025 (A.Y. 2025–26).)
“This position is not based on a statutory amendment but has evolved through judicial interpretation and has been consistently upheld in recent rulings up to A.Y. 2025–26.”
Income from House Property
Income arises due to ownership of property, Standard deduction of 30% on Net Annual Value, Generally, results in a lower tax burden, No deduction allowed for actual expenses
Maintenance charges will be taxed under House Property when:
Business Income(through property): Income earned from providing services using the property, Actual expenses are fully deductible, Higher compliance requirements, May attract GST implications
Conditions:Maintenance charges are taxed as Business Income when:
When the property owner provides active services such as security, lift maintenance, CCTV, housekeeping, power backup, or firefighting systems through a separate agreement, such receipts are considered payment for services rather than rent. This shifts taxation to business income.
What services did Karnani provide — and how?
Every tenant, in addition to paying monthly rent, had to make separate payments covering the following services: Charges for electric current — supplied to each flat and shop, Charges for use of lifts — maintained within the complex, Charges for supply of hot and cold water — to each flat etc
What made this particularly significant was how these services were delivered. The Tribunal found as a fact that:
The legal journey
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
Held that the services rendered constituted a business activity. Service charge income = business income under Sec 10 of the Income Tax Act, 1922. Rental income = house property income under Sec 9.
Calcutta High Court (Reference under Sec 66)
Reversed the Tribunal. Held that the income from services was still income from property (Sec 12 of the 1922 Act) — not business income. The High Court effectively merged both streams of income into one property head.
Supreme Court of India — 27 August 1971
Reversed the High Court. Restored the Tribunal's finding. Held service charges = business income. This is the landmark ruling.
Karnani is more than 50 years old and still the first case cited whenever maintenance income classification is disputed.
Any sum paid or credited on or after 1st April 2026 is governed by the corresponding provisions of the Income Tax Act, 2025.( New Sections)
New Section Reference:Section 393(1) [Table: Sl. No. 2(ii) .D(b)].
Who deducts: Any person other than individual/HUF — companies, firms, LLPs, AOP, trusts. Also individuals/HUFs if liable to tax audit under Sec 44AB (turnover >₹1 cr for business or >₹50L for profession) Threshold (updated): Budget 2025 raised the limit from ₹2.4L per year to ₹50,000 per month(600000 PA). If monthly rent exceeds ₹50,000 — TDS applies on the full amount
New Section Reference :Section 393(1) [Table: Sl. No. 2(i)].
Who deducts: Individual or HUF whose business turnover is below ₹1 cr / profession below ₹50L — i.e. not liable to tax audit
Threshold: Monthly rent exceeds ₹50,000
Rate: 2% (reduced from 5% effective October 2024)
New Section Reference: Section 393(1) [Table: Sl. No. 6(i).D(b)].
Who deducts: Any specified person paying for a works contract or service contract — companies, firms, trusts, tax-audit individuals/HUFs
Threshold: Single payment ≥ ₹30,000 OR aggregate payments to same party ≥ ₹1,00,000 in a FY — either condition triggers TDS
Rate — individual/HUF landlord: 1% of maintenance amount (excluding GST if shown separately)
Rate — company/firm landlord: 2% of maintenance amount (excluding GST if shown separately
The head of income depends on substance, not form — the nature of services matters more than what you call the payment
A separate, well-documented maintenance agreement can help in this classification
Classification as business income can reduce tax liability when actual costs exceed 30% of maintenance receipts TDS treatment (194C vs 194-I) and GST filings must align with the chosen income head
Review existing lease agreements — if bundled, consider restructuring prospectively with proper documentation Consult a CA before reclassifying — litigation risk exists, but the current judicial trend favours business income treatment when services are genuine
Author:Vijayshree
Prepared On:01/07/2026
Recent Posts
Related Newsletters
Please Share:
Increase the rate of Tax Collection at Source (TCS) from 5% to 20% for remittance under...
Every GST registered taxpayer must file at least one or more designated GST returns ...
In the dynamic landscape of entrepreneurship, startups are the catalysts of innovation, job creation, and economic growth...
Copyright B.C Shetty & Co. © 2026. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy , Terms and Conditions